Article Peer-Reviewed
Open
Peer Review
Peer Review
Sustainable Development and Underexplored Topics in Canada’s Energy Transition
College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC V9B 5Y2, Canada
Academic Editor:
Received: 18 December 2023 Accepted: 23 April 2024 Published: 2 May 2024
Abstract
Canada’s energy system is undergoing a fundamental shift, which will change how Canadians produce and consume energy. The success of Canada’s energy transition will be influenced by the ability of energy practitioners to manage the tensions and trade-offs in a variety of topics. The purpose of this research was to identify topics that are relevant to Canada’s energy transition and to identify the concepts that energy practitioners are using to manage the tensions and trade-offs in these topics. According to in-depth interviews with Canadian energy practitioners in 2021, the two most important topics in Canada’s energy transition are climate change and reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples. In addition, according to a 2021 focus group with Canadian energy practitioners, three relevant and underexplored topics in Canada’s energy transition are environmental rights, a systemic reduction in energy consumption, and learning from the energy transition in other countries, notably, Germany. These three underexplored topics were studied by completing additional in-depth interviews in 2022 and 2023, and a causal loop analysis in 2023. This research suggests that the concepts of sustainable development and multi-level perspective are complementary, can increase understanding of important and underexplored energy transition topics, and can generate solutions to complex sustainability challenges.
Figures in this Article
Figure 1
Figure 2
Keywords
energy transition; Canada; sustainable development; multi-level perspective; climate change; reconciliation
Copyright © 2024
Benson. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use and distribution provided that the original work is properly cited.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Cite this Article
Benson, M. (2024). Sustainable Development and Underexplored Topics in Canada’s Energy Transition. Highlights of Sustainability, 3(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.54175/hsustain3020012
References
1.
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., et al. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
2.
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
3.
Frantzeskaki, N., & de Haan, H. (2009). Transitions: Two steps from theory to policy. Futures, 41(9), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.04.009
4.
International Energy Agency. (2021). Net Zero by 2050. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (accessed 12 November 2023).
5.
Generation Energy Council. (2018). Canada’s Energy Transition: Getting to Our Energy Future, Together. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/energy/CoucilReport_july4_EN_Web.pdf (accessed 27 April 2023).
6.
Smil, V. (2017). Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives (2nd ed.). Praeger.
7.
Statistics Canada. (2023). Energy supply and demand, 2022. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/231120/dq231120c-eng.htm (accessed 28 March 2024).
8.
International Energy Agency. (2024). Energy system of Canada. https://www.iea.org/countries/canada (accessed 28 March 2024).
9.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
10.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2023). National Inventory Report 1990–2021: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada, Canada’s Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2023/eccc/En81-4-1-2021-eng.pdf (accessed 28 March 2024).
11.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf (accessed 30 September 2023).
12.
Parliament of Canada. (2021). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/U-2.2/page-1.html (accessed 10 September 2023).
13.
National Energy Board. (2019). Canada’s Energy Transition: Historical and future changes to energy systems. https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/data-analysis/energy-markets/canadas-energy-transition/cndsnrgtrnstn-eng.pdf (accessed 12 November 2023).
14.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada. (2023). Independent Auditor’s Report: Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act–2030 Emissions Reduction Plan. https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_cesd_202311_06_e.pdf (accessed 28 March 2024).
15.
Sandwell, R. W. (2016). Powering Up Canada: A history of power, fuel and energy from 1600. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
16.
Statistics Canada (2024). Estimation of Energy Poverty Rates Using the 2021 Census of Population. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/46-28-0001/2024001/article/00001-eng.htm (accessed 28 March 2024).
17.
Riva, M., Makasi, S. K., Dufresne, P., O’Sullivan, K., & Toth, M. (2021). Energy poverty in Canada: Prevalence, social and spatial distribution, and implications for research and policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102237
18.
Das, R. R., Martiskainen, M., & Li, G. (2022). Quantifying the prevalence of energy poverty across Canada: estimating domestic energy burden using an expenditures approach. The Canadian Geographer, 66(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12750
19.
Meadows, D., & Wright, D. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
20.
Clark, W. C., Van Kerkhoff, L., Lebel, L., & Gallopin, G. C. (2016). Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4570–4578. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601266113
21.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
22.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20 (accessed 27 April 2023).
23.
Boda, C., & Faran, T. (2018). Paradigm Found? Immanent Critique to Tackle Interdisciplinarity and Normativity in Science for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 10, 3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103805
24.
Boda, C. S., Scown, M., Faran, T., Nastar, M., Dorkenoo, K., Chaffin, B., et al. (2021). Framing Loss and Damage from climate change as the failure of Sustainable Development. Climate and Development, 13(8), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1851640
25.
Broman, G., & Robèrt, K. H. (2017). A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.121
26.
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K. H., & Broman, G. (2016). A Strategic Approach to Social Sustainability – Part 1: Exploring the Social System. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170
27.
Natural Step. (2023). The Four System Conditions of a Sustainable Society. https://www.thenaturalstep.org/approach (accessed 12 November 2023).
28.
Benson, M., Boda, C., Das, R. R., King, L., & Park, C. (2022). Sustainable development and Canada’s transitioning energy systems. Sustainability, 14, 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042213
29.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
30.
Derwort, P., Jager, N., & Newig, J. (2021). How to Explain Major Policy Change Towards Sustainability? Bringing Together the Multiple Streams Framework and the Multi-level Perspective on Socio-Technical Transitions to Explore the German “Energiewende”. Policy Studies Journal, 50(3), 671–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12428
31.
Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L., & Brannen, J. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212165
32.
Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
33.
Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38(9), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011
34.
Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957657
35.
Morris, A. (2015). A Practical Introduction to in-Depth Interviewing. SAGE Publications.
36.
Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2018). Generating qualitative data with experts and elites. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. SAGE Publications.
37.
Given, L. (2008). Snowball Sampling. In L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n425
38.
Sterman, J. (2002). System Dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/102741 (accessed 27 November 2023).
39.
Coletta, V. R., Pagano, A., Pluchinotta, I., Fratino, U., Scrieciu, A., Nanu, F., et al. (2021). Causal Loop Diagrams for supporting Nature Based Solutions participatory design and performance assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 280, 111668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111668
40.
Honti, G., Dörgő, G., & Abonyi, J. (2019). Review and structural analysis of system dynamics models in sustainability science. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118015
41.
Haraldsson, H. V., & Sverdrup, H. U. (2021). Systems science and system thinking in practice: How to develop qualitative and numerical models for evolving understandings of challenges and responses to complex policies. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/globalassets/media/publikationer-pdf/6900/978-91-620-6981-0.pdf (accessed 27 September 2023).
42.
United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf (accessed 12 November 2023).
43.
Stefanelli, R. D., Walker, C., Kornelsen, D., Lewis, D., Martin, D. H., Masuda, J., et al. (2019). Renewable energy and energy autonomy: how Indigenous peoples in Canada are shaping an energy future. Environmental Reviews, 27(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0024
44.
Christina, E., Hoicka, C., Savic, K., & Campney, A. (2021). Reconciliation through renewable energy? A survey of Indigenous communities, involvement, and peoples in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101897
45.
Scott, K. (2020). Reconciliation and Energy Democracy. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34, 480–491. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.6844
46.
McGregor, D., Whitaker, S., & Sritharan, M. (2020). Indigenous environmental justice and sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.007
47.
Energy Futures Lab. (2023). Vision and Mission. https://energyfutureslab.com/vision (accessed 12 November 2023).
48.
Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., et al. (2020). Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions. Sustainability Science, 15, 1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8
49.
United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf (accessed 27 April 2023).
50.
Parliament of Canada. (2021). Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-19.3/fulltext.html (accessed 10 September 2023).
51.
Sorrell, S. (2015). Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002
52.
Usman, R., Mirzania, P., Alnaser, S. W., Hart, P., & Long, C. (2022). Systematic Review of Demand-Side Management Strategies in Power Systems of Developed and Developing Countries. Energies, 15, 7858. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15217858
53.
Fuchs, D. A., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: a history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-005-8490-z
54.
Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Oikonomou, V. (2013). Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency: Exploring the concept of a feed-in tariff for energy savings. Energy Policy, 56, 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.019
55.
Moezzi, M. (2000). Decoupling Energy Efficiency from Energy Consumption. Energy & Environment, 11(5), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305001500301
56.
Jevons, W. S. (1865). The Coal Question: An Enquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and Probable Exhaustion of our Coal Mines. Macmillan and Company.
57.
Guo, J., Li, C. Z., & Wei, C. (2021). Decoupling economic and energy growth: aspiration or reality? Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe432
58.
Ritchie, N. (2021). Our World in Data: A number of countries have decoupled economic growth from energy use, even if we take offshored production into account. https://ourworldindata.org/energy-gdp-decoupling (accessed 27 September 2023).
59.
International Energy Agency. (2022). Sankey Diagrams: Canada Energy Balance. https://www.iea.org/sankey/#?c=Canada&s=Balance (accessed 27 April 2022).
60.
IEA, IRENA, UNSD, WB & WHO. (2022). Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report. https://trackingsdg7.esmap.org/data/files/download-documents/sdg7-report2022-full_report.pdf (accessed 25 June 2023).
61.
Sovacool, B. K., Bell, S. E., Daggett, C., Labuski, C., Lennon, M., Naylor, L., et al. (2023). Pluralizing energy justice: Incorporating feminist, anti-racist, Indigenous, and postcolonial perspectives. Energy Research & Social Science, 97, 102996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102996
62.
Benson, M., Boda, C., Das, R. R., King, L., & Park, C. (2023). Illuminating practitioner challenges in energy transitions. Heliyon, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22624
63.
Boyd, D. R. (2012). The Green Interview: Your Right to a Healthy Environment. https://thegreeninterview.com/interview/boyd-david (accessed 12 November 2023).
64.
Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S. E., Donges, J. F., et al. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37), eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
65.
Health Canada. (2021). Health Impacts of Air Pollution in Canada: Estimates of morbidity and premature mortality outcomes – 2021 Report. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/2021-health-effects-indoor-air-pollution.html (accessed 10 September 2023).
66.
Venton, M. (2009). Restoring the Balance: Recognition of Environmental Rights in British Columbia. https://ecojustice.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Restoring-the-Balance-2009.pdf (accessed 27 April 2023).
67.
Stone, C. D. (1972). Should Trees Have Standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 450–501.
68.
Unger, J. (2016). Environmental Rights in Alberta: Substantive Environmental Rights (a publication of the Environmental Law Centre’s Environmental Rights Program). https://elc.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/EBR_MOD-1_Substantive-Environmental-Rights-in-Alberta.pdf (accessed 18 February 2023).
69.
Boyd, D. R. (2017). The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World. ECW Press.
70.
United Nations. (2022). The human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3982508/files/A_76_L.75-EN.pdf?ln=en (accessed 28 March 2023).
71.
Borrows, J. (2010). Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. University of Toronto Press.
72.
MacLean, J. (2018). You Say You Want an Environmental Rights Revolution? Try Changing Canadians’ Minds Instead (of the Charter). Ottawa Law Review, 49, 183.
73.
Bill S-5. (2022). Senate of Canada: An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. 1999. https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/S-5/third-reading (accessed 27 September 2023).
74.
Collins, L. M., & Boyd, D. R. (2016). Non-Regression and the Charter Right to a Healthy Environment. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 29, 285–304.
75.
Garrett, R., & Wood, S. (2020). Rights of Nature Legislation for British Columbia: Issues and Options. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3823357
76.
Powell, B. (2018). Environmental rights in Alberta: an annotated environmental bill of rights for Alberta. https://elc.ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ELC-Annotated-EBR-March-2018.pdf (accessed 16 February 2023).
77.
Constitute Project. (2008). Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Ecuador_2021?lang=en (accessed 27 November 2023).
78.
Conseil des Innu de Ekuanitshit (2021). Résolution 919-082 (in French). http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload1072.pdf (accessed 12 November 2023).
79.
Municipalité Régionale de Comté de Minganie. (2021). Résolution 025-21 (in French). http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload1069.pdf (accessed 12 November 2023).
80.
Suzuki, D. (2013). The Green Interview: On Being Part of Nature. https://thegreeninterview.com/interview/suzuki-david (accessed 25 June 2023).
81.
Clean Energy Wire. (2022). The History of the Energiewende. https://www.cleanenergywire.org/dossiers/history-energiewende (accessed 12 November 2023).
82.
Rechsteiner, R. (2021). German energy transition (Energiewende) and what politicians can learn for environmental and climate policy. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 305–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01939-3
83.
Quitzow, R., & Thielges, S. (2022) The German energy transition as soft power. Review of International Political Economy, 29(2), 598–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1813190
84.
International Energy Agency. (2022). Sankey Diagrams: German Energy Balance. https://www.iea.org/sankey/#?c=Germany&s=Balance (accessed 27 April 2022).
85.
German Renewable Energies Agency. (2022). Key Facts about the Energy Transition in Germany. https://www.energydialogue.berlin/app/uploads/2022/03/betd_factsheet_2022.pdf (accessed 12 November 2023).
86.
German Environment Agency. (2022). Press Release: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rose by 4.5% in 2021. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/press/pressinformation/greenhouse-gas-emissions-rose-45-percent-in-2021 (accessed 12 November 2023).
87.
Markard, J. (2018). The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy, 3, 628–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7
88.
Löhr, M., & Mattes, J. (2022). Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121221
89.
Berthod, O., Blanchet, T., Busch, H., Kunze, C., Nolden, C., & Wenderlich, M. (2023). The Rise and Fall of Energy Democracy: 5 Cases of Collaborative Governance in Energy Systems. Environmental Management, 71, 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01687-8
90.
Solow, R. M. (1993). An almost practical step toward sustainability. Resources Policy, 19(3), 162–172.
91.
Daly, H. E. (2005). Economics in a full world. Scientific American, 293(3), 100–107.
92.
Solow, R. M. (1991). Sustainability: An Economist’s Perspective. The eighteenth J. Seward Johnson lecture. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
93.
Sen, A. (2011). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press.
94.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
95.
Sen, A. (2004). Why we should preserve the spotted owl. London Review of Books, 26(3). https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v26/n03/amartya-sen/why-we-should-preserve-the-spotted-owl (accessed 27 April 2024).
96.
Sen, A. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747492
97.
Harrison, K. (2019). Lessons from British Columbia’s carbon tax. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/july-2019/lessons-from-british-columbias-carbon-tax (accessed 16 January 2023).
98.
Deutsch, D. (2011). The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations that Transform the World. Penguin Books.
Metrics
Loading...
Journal Menu
Journal Contact
Highlights of Sustainability
Editorial Office
Highlights of Science
Avenida Madrid, 189-195, 3-3
08014 Barcelona, Spain
08014 Barcelona, Spain
Cathy Wang
Managing Editor
