Search Articles
                    
                    
                            Journal:
                            
                                                                    all
                                                            
                        
                        
                                                                            
                                Keyword:
                                business model
                            
                            
                                                
                        Total
                        —
                        
                            32 articles                        
                    
                Article    29 Oct 2025
    
                                    Barbara Marchetti,                             Guido Castelli and                             Francesco Corvaro                        
    
                    https://doi.org/10.54175/hsustain4040015
            
    77 Views26 Downloads
Article    23 Oct 2025
    
                                    Mehdi Hesam,                             Alfonso A. Vargas-Sánchez,                             Nima Moshiri Langroudi,                             Younes Saeedi Saraee and                             Zeynab Dargahi                        
    
                    https://doi.org/10.54175/hsustain4040014
            
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 4, pp. 216–239
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 4, pp. 216–239
    227 Views45 Downloads
Review    17 Oct 2025
    
                                    Jesús Huerta de Soto,                             Antonio Sánchez-Bayón and                             Philipp Bagus                        
    
                            
                                    This paper reviews the efficiency and sustainability of the management model during the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. There is a comparison between the centralized bureaucratic management versus the agile market alternative or spontaneous and flexible social
                                                    
                    
                            
            
                                    This paper reviews the efficiency and sustainability of the management model during the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. There is a comparison between the centralized bureaucratic management versus the agile market alternative or spontaneous and flexible social coordination. This is a study of Political Economy, Management, and Health Economics from the perspective of Austrian economics, with special attention to the Spanish case. The analysis is based on Mises theorem about the impossibility of economic calculation under centralized coactive systems, and other economic principles. In this context, we also pay attention to collateral problems of the centralized and coactive management. Finally, we propose a solution based on dynamic efficiency and the constitutions of wellbeing economics based on digitalization.
                                
                or
                Access Full Article
            
            
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 4, pp. 205–215
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 4, pp. 205–215
    385 Views57 Downloads
Article    8 Sep 2025
    
                                    Larry Dwyer                        
    
                            
                                    Across the social sciences, wellbeing measures are being developed to cover a more comprehensive picture of factors contributing to quality of life. However, ongoing neglect of the wellbeing outcomes of tourism activity has restricted the relevance
                                                    
                    
                            
            
                                    Across the social sciences, wellbeing measures are being developed to cover a more comprehensive picture of factors contributing to quality of life. However, ongoing neglect of the wellbeing outcomes of tourism activity has restricted the relevance of much tourism research, practice and policymaking globally. These include failure to recognise human wellbeing as the primary aim of any industrial development, including tourism; adherence to a superficial conception of the nature of wellbeing and its measures; a failure to acknowledge that human wellbeing, beyond “needs”, is an essential component of sustainable development; tourism stakeholder adherence to a primarily static, rather than dynamic conception of sustainability; failure to distinguish between “weak” and “strong” sustainability; uncritical adoption of a pro-growth mindset that is steadily depleting and degrading the resources and the wellbeing of life on the planet; failure to incorporate wellbeing outcomes into tourism business mission statements; and failure to treat seriously the need for tourism degrowth at least for some sectors of the industry. To address such failures, tourism decisionmakers must incorporate stakeholder wellbeing outcomes into conceptual analysis, empirical research and policy assessment.
                                
                or
                Access Full Article
            
            
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 3, pp. 192–204
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 3, pp. 192–204
    561 Views132 Downloads
Article    3 Apr 2025
    
                                    Martin Wynn and                             Peter Jones                        
    
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 2, pp. 95–107
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 2, pp. 95–107
    1764 Views1498 Downloads
Article    7 Mar 2025
    
                                    Andreas Plesner,                             Allan P. Engsig-Karup and                             Hans True                        
    
        Highlights of Vehicles
Volume 3 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 1–14
Volume 3 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 1–14
    1563 Views381 Downloads
Article    22 Feb 2025
    
                                    Assitan Diaby,                             Mehdi Seraj and                             Huseyin Ozdeser                        
    
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 56–68
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 56–68
    1547 Views440 Downloads
Article    20 Feb 2025
    
                                    Anna C. Schomberg,                             Clemens Mostert and                             Stefan Bringezu                        
    
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 38–55
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 38–55
    2441 Views526 Downloads
Article    1 Feb 2025
    
                                    Bogusław Ślusarczyk,                             Małgorzata A. Kozłowska and                             Zuzanna A. Kozłowska                        
    
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 16–37
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 16–37
    1601 Views314 Downloads
Article    15 Jan 2025
    
                                    Michael Tarrant,                             Mikell Gleason,                             Steven Boyd and                             Tony Wellington                        
    
                            
                                    We adopt a normative model of crowd tolerance (expressed as a willingness to support more or fewer tourists) as a proxy for overtourism. Consistent with Social Exchange Theory, it is proposed that a person will perceive
                                                    
                    
                            
            
                                    We adopt a normative model of crowd tolerance (expressed as a willingness to support more or fewer tourists) as a proxy for overtourism. Consistent with Social Exchange Theory, it is proposed that a person will perceive the impacts of tourism at a destination as positive or negative depending on the extent to which they view visitor levels as under or over a threshold that they expect or support (i.e., their norms or tolerance level). A total of 420 residents and 1048 visitors completed a survey interview in the tourist shire of Noosa between 2022 and 2024. Results show that residents and visitors differed significantly on many of the perceived tourism impacts, with long-term residents less favorable to the positive impacts than visitors. There was broad consensus across both residents and tourists, and the highest level of agreement, with negative impacts (especially that tourism contributes to traffic and parking congestion, and higher prices). The lowest levels of agreement with positive tourism impacts were found for “over tourists” (respondents who supported a fewer number of tourists). Implications for sustainable destination management are discussed in the context of the Quadruple Bottom Line, including efforts that enable tourism communities to grow well using a guardianship ethos and collective action of Gifts and Gains.
                                
                or
                Access Full Article
            
            
        Highlights of Sustainability
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 1–15
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 1, pp. 1–15
    1990 Views599 Downloads2 Citations
Volume 4 (2025), Issue 4, pp. 240–255