%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2022-03-10T16:26:42+01:00
2022-03-10T16:26:40+01:00
2022-03-10T16:26:42+01:00
Acrobat PDFMaker 20 for Word
uuid:c601d404-d45e-4734-9a2c-cb367a010560
uuid:2669e2b9-5e68-4ec9-b0ea-59a5f551cd47
2
application/pdf
Understanding Environmentally Conscious Behaviour Through Environmental Identity
This paper argues that the strongly established connection between identity and consumer behaviour may not be necessarily applicable in examining environmentally conscious behaviour through an identity lens due to several other factors that may especially influence environmental identity formation; (1) the continuously evolving nature of environmental identity in the context of complexities (i.e., political debates, climate change science) of climate change; (2) the challenges of expressing inner connection with nature (i.e., instrumental value vs. intrinsic value); (3) the various cultural and symbolic meanings associated with environmentally conscious behaviour (i.e., functional benefits vs emotional benefits) and (4) different forms of behavioural practices (i.e., environmentally conscious behaviour vs. anti-consumption). Therefore, this paper recommends utilising insights and measurements unique to environmentally conscious behaviour as opposed to that of general consumer behaviour because the antecedents of the former, especially environmental identity projections can be multifaceted.
Chamila Roshani Perera;Lester W. Johnson
Adobe PDF Library 20.6.66
environmentally conscious behaviour; consumer behaviour; environmental identity
D:20220309200230
0x01010050771244A2166846925CB55D95B8C9E5
This paper argues that the strongly established connection between identity and consumer behaviour may not be necessarily applicable in examining environmentally conscious behaviour through an identity lens due to several other factors that may especially influence environmental identity formation; (1) the continuously evolving nature of environmental identity in the context of complexities (i.e., political debates, climate change science) of climate change; (2) the challenges of expressing inner connection with nature (i.e., instrumental value vs. intrinsic value); (3) the various cultural and symbolic meanings associated with environmentally conscious behaviour (i.e., functional benefits vs emotional benefits) and (4) different forms of behavioural practices (i.e., environmentally conscious behaviour vs. anti-consumption). Therefore, this paper recommends utilising insights and measurements unique to environmentally conscious behaviour as opposed to that of general consumer behaviour because the antecedents of the former, especially environmental identity projections can be multifaceted.
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
HWIwW~'/9N|s%JbƢ